11/5: Boxer Goes Nuclear on Climate Bill

In an unprecedented show of partisan arrogance, the Environment and Public Works (EPW) Committee just sent S. 1733 (the Kerry-Boxer climate bill) to the floor of the Senate with not a single Republican member present.

As EPW procedural rules prohibit modifications or amendments to bills short the attendance of at least 2 minority members, the bill was reported out as written, with no amendments considered or debated.  And, while many Democrats lamented that limitation during their speeches, all but one — Sen. Max Baucus (D-Mont) — voted to nonetheless move the bill ahead.

Comments

While we believe in the First Amendment, individuals posting to this website agree to maintain a civil tone in keeping with the 9 Principles and 12 Values on which the site is based. Moderators may choose to remove comments that do otherwise and/or restrict future posting.

5 Responses to “11/5: Boxer Goes Nuclear on Climate Bill”
  1. RB60 says:

    Let’s face a few facts here…
    This legislation will put this country in a world of hurt.
    It will all but destroy an already failing economy.
    Energy costs will soar, causing job losses to compensate for higher operating expenses.
    The average hard-working American will struggle to pay to heat their homes, drive to work.
    The retired who live on fixed incomes will be forced out of their homes, no longer being able to
    afford the rising energy costs (my retired parents are contemplating selling their home of 59+ years
    because of rising energy costs and rising taxes now).

    It seems that these politicians have no concern for the average citizen who is struggling to keep
    their home and remain employed (those who still are). They couldn’t care less about the negative
    consequences it will have on us all.

  2. jcs says:

    Why is it this website won’t let me post on other topics?

  3. jcs says:

    That’s a slant. There was “not a single Republican member present” because they boycotted the meeting.

    There’s a problem getting bipartison legislation when one party, the Republican party in this case, sees no benefit to doing anything other than blocking legislation.


Subscribe to Glenn Beck - The 912 ProjectSubscribe to NewsSubscribe to Glenn Beck – The 912 ProjectSubscribe to Comments